Skip to main content
· 11/13/2003

Sorci v. Iowa District Court for Polk County

Citations

  • 671 N.W.2d 482
  • 2003 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 203
  • 2003 WL 22674395

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding error not preserved on issues not presented to the district court
  • holding error not preserved on issues not presented to the district court
  • “The rule is well established that in certiorari actions we will not review questions not presented to the so-called inferior tribunal.” (cleaned up)
  • “Iowa Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.301 requires a plaintiff to ‘state [in the petition for certiorari] whether the plaintiff raised the issue in district court.’” (alteration in original)
  • prohibition against representing a party against a former client is “based in Canon 4, but also implicates Canon 9, insofar as both canons seek to preserve public confidence in the legal system”
  • setting forth basic error preservation principles

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Streit, Lavorato, Wiggins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.