Soos v. Mallinckrodt Chemical Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• overruled on other grounds by Hampton v. Big Boy Steel Erection , 121 S.W.3d 220 , 223 (Mo. banc 2003)
• “If no such evidence is adduced, we presume that the employer was prejudiced by the lack of notice because it was not able to make a timely investigation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).