Skip to main content
· 3/6/2017

Soo Line R.R. Co. v. Werner Enters.

Citations

  • 137 S. Ct. 1224
  • 197 L. Ed. 2d 477
  • 85 U.S.L.W. 3416
  • 2017 WL 856395
  • 2017 U.S. LEXIS 1587

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • it is “presumed that the legislators who drafted and passed [a statute] were familiar with all existing law applicable to the subject-matter, whether constitutional, statutory, or common, and intended the statute to harmonize completely with the same…”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Consideration, Took

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.