Soo Line Railroad v. Tang Industries, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• continuing tort doctrine did not apply where defendant stopped dumping contaminants years prior, \although the effects from [defendant]'s violations may be persisting\
• continuing tort doc- trine did not apply where defendant stopped dumping con- taminants years prior, “although the effects from [defend- ant]’s violations may be persisting”
• continuing tort doc- trine did not apply where defendant stopped dumping con- taminants years prior, “although the effects from [defend- ant]’s violations may be persisting”
• “In its amended complaint, plaintiff alleges that it has incurred and continues to incur “necessary” response costs “consistent with the NCP.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).