Skip to main content
· 9/21/1994

Soo Line Railroad v. Iowa Department of Transportation

Citations

  • 521 N.W.2d 685
  • 1994 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 211
  • 1994 WL 515746

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “random mention” of issue in a brief “without elaboration or supportive authority, is insufficient to raise the issue” for appellate review
  • holding that “random mention” of issue in brief “without elaboration or supportive authority, is insufficient to raise the issue” for appellate review
  • holding that “random mention” of issue in a brief “without elaboration or supportive authority, is insufficient to raise the issue” for appellate review
  • holding “random mention of an issue, without elaboration or supportive authority, is insufficient to raise the issue for” appellate consideration
  • holding mention of an issue, without elaboration or supportive authority, is insufficient to raise the issue for appellate consideration
  • holding random mention of issue without elaboration or supporting authority does not allow review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGiverin, Carter, Lavorato, Snell, Ternus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.