· 1/25/1977
Soo Line Railroad Company v. Fruehauf Corporation
Citations
- 547 F.2d 1365
- 1 Fed. R. Serv. 1298
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding expert testimony was properly admitted to interpret technical construction specifications
- “Section 2- 719(2) becomes operative when a party is deprived of its contractual remedy.”
- sale of 500 covered hopper freight railroad cars
- applying Minnesota law; seller refused to repair
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gibson, Lay, Stephenson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.