Skip to main content
· 1/25/1977

Soo Line Railroad Company v. Fruehauf Corporation

Citations

  • 547 F.2d 1365
  • 1 Fed. R. Serv. 1298

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding expert testimony was properly admitted to interpret technical construction specifications
  • “Section 2- 719(2) becomes operative when a party is deprived of its contractual remedy.”
  • sale of 500 covered hopper freight railroad cars
  • applying Minnesota law; seller refused to repair

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gibson, Lay, Stephenson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.