Skip to main content
· 6/9/2008

Sonoco Products Co. v. South Carolina Department of Revenue

Citations

  • 662 S.E.2d 599
  • 378 S.C. 385
  • 2008 S.C. LEXIS 175

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • implicitly applying a de novo standard of review when “[t]he ultimate decision in this case is dependent upon the Court’s determination of the term ‘contiguous’ within the meaning of [a statute]”
  • where the term \contiguous\ was not defined in the applicable statute, the court reviewed dictionaries, state statutes, and state appellate decisions that dealt with the concept of contiguity in order to glean the appropriate definition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beatty, Moore, Pleicones, Toal, Waller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.