Sonny Boy Oats, Jr. v. State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the failure on one prong of the ID test is not necessarily dispositive
• holding that the failure on one prong of the ID test is not necessarily dispositive
• holding that section 921.137(1), Florida Statutes, requires only that intellectual disability be demonstrated to have manifested prior to age eighteen, not that it be diagnosed
• “[A]s the Supreme Court has now recognized, because these factors are interdependent, if one of the prongs is relatively less strong, a finding of intellectual disability may still be warranted based on the strength of other prongs.” (citing Hall, 134 S. Ct. at 2001)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).