· 1/19/1996
Sonnenblick-Goldman Co. v. ITT Corp.
Citations
- 912 F. Supp. 85
- 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 529
- 1996 WL 22335
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “[p]iercing the corporate veil is a state law claim”
- applying Delaware law to claim to pierce Delaware corporation’s veil in order to impose breach-of-eontract liability upon its parent
- “In evaluating the existence of fraudulent joinder, the Court must determine whether the mere possibility exists that plaintiff can establish any cause of action against a defendant.”
- “In evaluating the existence of fraudulent joinder, the Court must determine whether the mere possibility exists that plaintiff can establish any cause of action against a defendant.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Batts
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.