Sonne v. Sacks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Holding that the Superior Court lacks jurisdiction to ‘pierce the corporate veil’ against corporate officers or stockholders
• holding piercing the corporate veil could only be done in Delaware's Court of Chancery
• stating that “piercing the corporate veil may be done only in the Court of Chancery, when the purpose of the action is to obtain a judgment against individual stockholders or officers”
• “[P]iercing the corporate veil may be done only in the Court of Chancery . . . .”
• “piercing the corporate veil may be done only in the Court of Chancery,” an equitable court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).