· 9/10/2009
Sonia F. v. Eighth Judicial District Court
Citations
- 215 P.3d 705
- 125 Nev. 495
- 125 Nev. Adv. Rep. 38
- 2009 Nev. LEXIS 52
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that \the consideration of an extraordinary writ is often justified where an important issue of law needs clarification\ (internal quotation omitted)
- observing that \the consideration of an extraordinary writ is often justified where an important issue of law needs clarification\ (internal quotation omitted)
- “When a statute is facially clear, this court will give effect to the statute’s plain meaning and not go beyond the plain language to determine the Legislature’s intent.”
- “[W}here the Legislature SUPREME CouRT OF NEVADA 10
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hardesty, Parraguirre, Douglas, Cherry, Saitta, Gibbons, Pickering
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.