Skip to main content
· 9/10/2009

Sonia F. v. Eighth Judicial District Court

Citations

  • 215 P.3d 705
  • 125 Nev. 495
  • 125 Nev. Adv. Rep. 38
  • 2009 Nev. LEXIS 52

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that \the consideration of an extraordinary writ is often justified where an important issue of law needs clarification\ (internal quotation omitted)
  • observing that \the consideration of an extraordinary writ is often justified where an important issue of law needs clarification\ (internal quotation omitted)
  • “When a statute is facially clear, this court will give effect to the statute’s plain meaning and not go beyond the plain language to determine the Legislature’s intent.”
  • “[W}here the Legislature SUPREME CouRT OF NEVADA 10

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hardesty, Parraguirre, Douglas, Cherry, Saitta, Gibbons, Pickering

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.