Sonia CARLSON, Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no error where the VE specifically noted that some DOT job classifications required less severe restrictions that were compatible with the claimants stated impairments
• DOT definition of a particular job represents only “approximate maximum requirements of each position, rather than the range”
• DOT definitions of particular jobs represent only the “‘approximate maximum requirements for each position, rather than [the] range’”
• VE properly took into account individual's need to alternate positions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).