Skip to main content
· 1/24/2006

Song Jin Wu v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Citations

  • 436 F.3d 157
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 1673
  • 2006 WL 164769

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that where attorney received notice applicant could only move to rescind based on exceptional circumstances, not lack of notice
  • finding that notice to an alien’s attorney of record constitutes notice to the alien
  • determining, 3 1 under prior version of the statute, that petitioner failed to rebut presumption of 2 proper notice when attorney of record received notice of the hearing
  • “There is no evidence that delivery was improper or that nondelivery was not due to [Petitioner’s] failure to provide his correct address. Thus, [Petitioner] failed to rebut the presumption of proper notice” arising from service upon counsel of record.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cardamone, Jacobs, Cabranes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.