Soneff v. Harlan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing detrimental reliance as “one of the elements necessary to establish fraud”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Marquardt v. Perry
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2008-12-11· cited 47×
• Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. v. Andrews
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1987-02-19· cited 29×
• Fasing v. LaFond
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1997-01-30· cited 17×
• Harris v. Hanson
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1991-04-04· cited 8×
• Swartz v. Bianco Family Trust
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1993-11-18· cited 7×
• Virdanco, Inc. v. MTS International
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1991-09-26· cited 6×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. Westover
  Supreme Court· 1959-05-25· cited 1,664×
• Meiter v. Cavanaugh
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1978-03-16· cited 228×
• Miller v. Carnation Company
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1973-10-02· cited 88×
• Lee v. Durango Music
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1960-10-17· cited 53×
• Leadville Water Co. v. Parkville Water District
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1967-12-18· cited 49×
• Peterson v. Colorado Potato Flake & Mfg. Co.
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1967-12-11· cited 44×
• Gossard v. Watson
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1950-07-29· cited 44×
• Zimmerman v. Loose
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1967-03-06· cited 25×
• Sedalia Land Co. v. ROBINSON BRICK AND TILE CO
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1970-09-29· cited 16×
• Sussex Real Estate Corp. v. Sbrocca
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1981-04-30· cited 5×