Sondergaard v. Sheriff, Clark County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• 128-day delay between arrest and arraignment did not deny defendant his right to a speedy trial
• 128-day delay between arrest and arraignment did not deny defendant his right to a speedy trial
• violation of NRS 178.460, which requires that the State bring a defendant to trial within 60 days after being notified that the defendant is competent to stand trial, does not establish constitutional speedy trial violation or right to habeas relief.
• violation of NRS 178.460, which requires that the State bring a defendant to trial within 60 days after being notified that the defendant is competent to stand trial, does not establish constitutional speedy trial violation or right to habeas relief.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).