Sommers v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[f]ailing to allege new facts or offering a duplicative amendment can be grounds for denying leave to amend”
• deny- ing motion for leave to amend a complaint because the “proposed amended complaint includes, without authorization, claims that have already been dismissed”
• where plaintiffs moved 5 on day of deadline for leave to add parties, court found “plaintiffs’ motion was timely filed before the deadline to amend the complaint or join parties set in the scheduling order”
• “Inconvenience or additional cost to a defendant is not necessarily undue prejudice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).