Sommers Oil Co. v. Georgia Department of Agriculture

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting a plaintiff’s attempt to “couch” their claim under negligence, further stating that “[n]omenclature notwithstanding, the substance of a claim must be considered, and a party cannot do indirectly what the law does not allow to be done directly.”
• State agency is immune from suit predicated on State employee’s collusion in fraudulent inspection of fuel pumps

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).