Skip to main content
· 8/24/2006

Sommer v. the Vanguard Group

Citations

  • 461 F.3d 397
  • 11 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1396
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 21638

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that an interference claim requires an employee to show that he was not only entitled to FMLA benefits but that he was denied those benefits
  • “An interference action is not about discrimination, it is only about whether the employer provided the employee with the entitlements guaranteed by the FMLA.”
  • “Because the FMLA is not about discrimination, a McDonnell-Douglas burden- shifting analysis is not required.”
  • “An interference action is not about discrimination, it is only about whether the employer provided the employee with the entitlements guaranteed by the FMLA.”
  • “Because the FMLA is not about discrimination, a McDonnell-Douglas burden-shifting analysis is not required.”
  • “Because the FMLA is not about discrimination, a McDonnell–Douglas burden-shifting analysis is not required.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.