Solution Source, Inc. v. LPR Associates Ltd. Partnership

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that postjudgment attorney fees are available under the Construction Lien Act, MCL 570.1101 et seq.
• stating that “satisfaction of a lien does not bar a lien claimant who is the prevailing party from recovering its appellate and postjudgment attorney fees incurred in connection with enforcement of its lien”
• pointing out that attorney fees associated with the garnishment of personal property were not allowed by the trial court under the Michigan mechanic’s lien statutes
• “A lien claimant without significant financial resources could end up being forced to abandon his valid lien claim if met with resistance from the lienor at every turn.”
• “A lien claimant without significant financial resources could end up being forced to abandon his valid lien claim if met with resistance from the lienor at every turn.”
• “[I]f a construction lien has not been satisfied or discharged before trial, a court still has jurisdiction to award attorney fees in relation to enforcement or collection of the lien.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).