Skip to main content
· 8/23/2010

SOLSBEE v. Astrue

Citations

  • 737 F. Supp. 2d 102
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86203
  • 2010 WL 3369612

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “If the ALJ chooses to proceed without vocational expert testimony, the ALJ ‘must provide a similar degree of specificity to achieve the underlying objectives of procedural fairness to the claimant and preservation of an adequate record of review.’”
  • “The mere fact that a plaintiff carried on certain daily activities, 27 such as grocery shopping, driving a car, or limited walking for exercise does not in any way detract from [Plaintiff’s] credibility as to [his or her] overall disability”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Michael A. Telesca

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.