Second Circuit· 4/8/2010

Solow v. Kalikow

Citations

602 F.3d 82
602 F. Supp. 3d 82
2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 7247
52 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 276
2010 WL 1407159

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that enforcement of a pre-existing injunction “permits the resolution of the motion as a contested matter rather than through an adversary proceeding”
concluding parties’ lawyer was implicitly authorized to accept service where attorney repeatedly filed papers on defendant’s behalf in same and other proceedings
implying that bankruptcy courts may utilize their “inherent powers” to impose sanctions
finding “reasonable notice” of a motion that did not name every party against whom relief was sought was “sufficiently descriptive” to alert non-named parties who were served
rejecting the argument that Section 105 may serve as an independent basis to award sanctions in the absence of a violation of another provision of the Bankruptcy Code
\The statutory contempt powers given to a bankruptcy court under § 105(a) complement the inherent powers of a federal court to enforce its own orders.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miner, Raggi, Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

53 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.