Solow v. Kalikow

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that enforcement of a pre-existing injunction “permits the resolution of the motion as a contested matter rather than through an adversary proceeding”
• concluding parties’ lawyer was implicitly authorized to accept service where attorney repeatedly filed papers on defendant’s behalf in same and other proceedings
• implying that bankruptcy courts may utilize their “inherent powers” to impose sanctions
• finding “reasonable notice” of a motion that did not name every party against whom relief was sought was “sufficiently descriptive” to alert non-named parties who were served
• rejecting the argument that Section 105 may serve as an independent basis to award sanctions in the absence of a violation of another provision of the Bankruptcy Code
• \The statutory contempt powers given to a bankruptcy court under § 105(a) complement the inherent powers of a federal court to enforce its own orders.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).