Solonina v. Artglass International

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff had sufficiently alleged an Eighth Amendment claim when he asserted a denial of physical exercise for a four- month period
• holding that the plaintiff had sufficiently alleged an Eighth Amendment claim when he asserted a denial of physical exercise for a four-month period
• holding that slippery conditions in a recreation yard were not a grave and intolerable risk under the Eighth Amendment
• noting that \deprivations of physical exercise for short periods will not rise to constitutional dimension\
• observing that inmate had not made “any claims of exceptional circumstances that would elevate the Green Haven yard conditions beyond the typical level of danger presented by a slippery sidewalk or a wet floor.”
• affirming “[a] complaint filed by a plaintiff pro se is to be construed ‘liberally to raise the strongest arguments [it] suggest[s].’” (quoting Walker v. Schult, 717 F.3d 119, 124 (2d Cir. 2013))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).