Skip to main content
· 12/8/1890

Solomons v. United States

Citations

  • 137 U.S. 342
  • 11 S. Ct. 88
  • 34 L. Ed. 667
  • 1890 U.S. LEXIS 2092

Syllabus

<p>When a person in the émploy of the United States makes an invention of value and takes out letters patent for it, the government, if it makes use of the invention without the consent of' the patentee, becomes thereby liable to pay the patentee therefor.</p> <p>If a person in the employ and pay of another, or of the United States, is directed to devise or perfect an instrument or means for accomplishing a prescribed result, and he obeys, and succeeds, and takes' out letters patent for his invention or discovery, he cannot, after successfully accomplishing the work for which he was employed, plead title thereto as against his employer.</p> <p>When a person in the employ of another in a certain line of work devises , an improved method or instrument for doing that work, and uses the property of his employer and the services of other employés to develop and put in practicable form his invention, and explicitly assents to the use by his employer of such invention, a jury, or a court trying the facts, is warranted in finding that he has so far recognized the obligations of service flowing from his employment and the benefits resulting from his use of the property, and the assistance of the coemployés,.of his employer, as to have given to such employer an irrevocable license to use such invention.</p> <p>McClurg v. Kingsland, 1 How. 202, affirmed and applied.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the use of employer’s property and machinery to devise an internal revenue stamp was part of the duty of the employee and therefore the employer owned the right to use the stamp without compensating the employee
  • “whatever invention [an inventor] may thus con ceive and perfect is his individual property”
  • “whatever invention [an inventor] may thus conceive and perfect is his individual property”
  • “If one is employed to devise or perfect an instrument, or a means for accomplishing a prescribed result, he cannot, after successfully accomplishing the work for which he was employed, plead title thereto as against his employer.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brewer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.