Solomon v. Solomon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A court may not consider potential future, or even anticipated, events as a substitute for evidence.”
• “A court may not consider potential future, or even anticipated, events as a substitute for evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• RACHEL A. CHALMERS v. JOSEPH A. CHALMERS
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-11-28· cited 7×
• CHRISTOPHER CLARK v. BRITTANY MEIZLIK
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2020-01-29
• JOHELI CRUZ WHITE v. KEVIN LEE-YUK
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2022-09-21
• Allison Giacomaro v. Jonathan Brossia
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-10-16
• Amber Marie Harman v. Yonder Alonso
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-10-29

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Arthur v. Arthur
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2010-01-14· cited 27×
• Nelson v. Nelson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-03-14· cited 22×
• Botterbusch v. Botterbusch
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-08-13· cited 15×
• Purin v. Purin
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-02-25· cited 3×