Connecticut Appellate Court· 7/24/1990
Solomon v. Keiser
Citations
- 22 Conn. App. 424
- 577 A.2d 1103
- 1990 Conn. App. LEXIS 249
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[m]oreover, under General Statutes § 52-212 and Practice Book § 326 [now § 17-4], the court may open a judgment only upon motion of one of the parties”
- ‘[m]ore-over, under General Statutes § 52-212 and Practice Book § 326 [now § 17-4], the court may open a judgment only upon motion of one of the parties’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Connell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re Baby Girl B.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-12-08· cited 196×
- Yeong Gil Kim v. MagnottaConnecticut Appellate Court· 1998-06-23· cited 35×
- Richards v. RichardsConnecticut Appellate Court· 2003-08-19· cited 18×
- Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. v. TarroConnecticut Appellate Court· 1995-02-28· cited 14×
- Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2003-07-01· cited 13×
- Magowan v. MagowanConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-11-26· cited 12×
- In re Travis R.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2004-01-06· cited 10×
- Barnett v. BarnettConnecticut Appellate Court· 1992-01-07· cited 9×
- Ducci Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. Department of TransportationConnecticut Appellate Court· 1992-07-07· cited 7×
- Rodriguez v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court· 2003-05-13· cited 7×
- Carabetta v. CarabettaConnecticut Appellate Court· 2012-02-21· cited 6×
- Sanzo v. SanzoConnecticut Appellate Court· 2012-07-31· cited 4×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.