· 6/5/1961
Solomon v. Gillis
Citations
- 366 U.S. 946
- 81 S. Ct. 1678
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that when considering whether a plaintiff has shown disparate impact, the focus should be on whether the challenged requirements operate to disqualify minority voters at a substantially higher rate
- “When considering disparate effect the focus should not be on absolute numbers . . . .”
- reversing dis- trict court’s refusal to recognize Rule 36 admission
- reversing dis- trict court’s refusal to recognize Rule 36 admission
- reversing district court’s refusal to recognize Rule 36 admission
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.