Skip to main content
· 6/5/1961

Solomon v. Gillis

Citations

  • 366 U.S. 946
  • 81 S. Ct. 1678

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that when considering whether a plaintiff has shown disparate impact, the focus should be on whether the challenged requirements operate to disqualify minority voters at a substantially higher rate
  • “When considering disparate effect the focus should not be on absolute numbers . . . .”
  • reversing dis- trict court’s refusal to recognize Rule 36 admission
  • reversing dis- trict court’s refusal to recognize Rule 36 admission
  • reversing district court’s refusal to recognize Rule 36 admission

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.