Solomon v. Falcone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that plaintiff's claims, including an alleged violation of the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1601, et seq., were properly asserted against defendants as successors in interest and assignees of plaintiff’s mortgage loan
• applying the CPPA to “ma[king], fund[ing], and/or securitize[ing] unconscionable” refinanced mortgage loans
• “ln passing [the Truth in Lending Act], Congress sought to ensure the accurate and meaningful disclosure of material terms to consumers in credit transactions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).