Skip to main content
· 1/6/2012

Solomon v. Abercrombie.

Citations

  • 126 Haw. 283
  • 270 P.3d 1013
  • 2012 Haw. LEXIS 6

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that reapportionment plan was invalid under article IV, section 4 of our constitution because it included non-permanent residents in the population base for reapportionment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Recktenwald, Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, Mekenna

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.