Solo Cup Co. v. United States District Court for the Central District of California

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the appellate court’s “review is limited to the record presented to the district court at the time of summary 3 judgment”
• discussing propriety of collapsing the transaction in view of factors such as selling shareholders' knowledge and their duties to the debtor corporation and its creditors
• discussing factors relating to issues of shareholder good faith as it relates to LBO/fraudulent transfer liability
• affirming the district court’s decision declining to (1) enter the judgment in the form sought by the trustee or (2
• bank which received funds and applied them to satisfy an obligation owed it by a third party was a “transferee”
• “Our review is limited to the record presented to the district court at the time of summary judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).