Solmica of the Gulf Coast, Inc. v. Braggs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an employer could be held liable for the unauthorized acts of the employee
• holding that the evidence created an issue of fact as to whether injurious conduct that occurred after normal working hours was within the scope of the employee’s employment because the conduct conferred a benefit on the employer
• “The conduct of the employee, to come within the rule, must not be impelled by motives that are wholly personal, or to gratify his own feelings or resentment, but should be in promotion of the business of his employment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).