Solis v. Prince George's County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that while the “LGTCA represents a limited waiver of a municipality’s governmental immunity,” the LGTCA “does not authorize the maintenance of a suit directly against the local government”
• finding that when nonmoving plaintiff relied on his own interrogatory answers to oppose a summary judgment motion, his answers lacked probative force because they were not based on personal knowledge
• explaining that where there is “no evidence of [the arresting officer’s] involvement at the commencement of the adversarial proceeding against [plaintiff],” summary judgment as to plaintiff’s Sixth Amendment claim was warranted
• dismissing the plaintiffs complaint where although the plaintiff could not return to work, there was no evidence his emotional distress interfered with his normal life activities outside work
• noting “[u]nsworn statements do not qualify as affidavits and are not considered by the Court when ruling on a motion for summary judgment.”
• “[U]nsworn expert reports, which may have been prepared in compliance with Rule 26(a)(2), will not be considered by the Court for purposes of summary judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).