Solis v. International Detective & Protective Service, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adopting Secretary’s calculations where reliable evidence supported the amount and where the employer did not submit contrary facts
• finding operational control and direct involvement with pay and employment practices rendered individuals “employers” under the FLSA
• noting that “monitoring client worksites involved normal, unspecialized” work”
• president and sole owner of commercial security company was “employer” under FLSA where owner was responsible for payroll, accounting, and invoicing, signed paychecks, and controlled all of company’s corporate activities
• same, where security guards were an integral part of a security services company’s business
• undisputed facts showing that alleged employer oversaw hiring and firing supported finding employer status

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).