Solid 21, Inc. v. Breitling USA, Inc.

Oral argument

• Argued

  27 min recording
  Listen

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that employee retention is “[a decision] which we expect inherently to be grounded in considerations of policy[ ]”
• holding that the Park Service's maintenance decisions regarding the guardrail system on the Baltimore-Washington Parkway fell within the exception
• holding that guardrail design judgment based on policies of resource allocation, as well as safety
• holding that a decision not to replace a guardrail on a National Service Parkway was a discretionary function
• holding that a decision not to replace a guardrail on a National Service Parkway was a discretionary function
• holding that statutory language requiring the National Parks Service to “provide a protected, safe, and suitable” roadway could not “be interpreted as removing all safety-related decisions from the discretion of the agency.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).