Skip to main content
· 4/14/1976

Soley v. State Commission on Human Relations

Citations

  • 356 A.2d 254
  • 277 Md. 521
  • 1976 Md. LEXIS 983

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that administrative remedies need not be exhausted “where there is no adequate administrative remedy or provision for review of the agency decision”
  • stating that “to permit interruption for purposes of judicial intervention at various stages of the administrative process might well undermine the very efficiency which the Legislature intended to achieve in the first instance”
  • requiring exhaustion even “where the act of an administrative agency is alleged to be ultra vires or illegal”
  • dismissing declaratory judgment action alleging ultra vires actions by State Commission on Human Relations because any judicial review must lie from the administrative remedy, not in a declaratory judgment action
  • interpretation of provision in Art. 49B setting forth requirements for complaints issued by Human Relations Commission
  • demurrer sustained against apartment owners who filed declaratory judgment action to restrain Human Relations Commission from enforcing subpoena duces tecum

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Singley, Smith, Digges, Levine, Eldridge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.