Soler v. Board of Public Education

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \the introduction of nonstatutory mitigating evidence is meaningless if the jury is instructed not to consider that evidence\
• “the introduction of nonstatutory mitigating evidence is meaningless if the jury is instructed not to consider that evidence”
• counsel performed inadequately when he failed to secure testimony of available psychiatrist who would have testified favorably and instead called medical witness who testified unfavorably as to statutory mitigating circumstances
• failure to present evidence at sentencing may not be strategic

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).