Skip to main content
· 6/13/2006

Sole Resort, S.A. De C v. V. Allure Resorts Management, Llc, Docket No. 05-5786-Cv

Citations

  • 450 F.3d 100
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 14538

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • implying that the nexus requirement is met unless “the event giving rise to the plaintiffs injury had, at best, a tangential relationship to any contacts the defendant had with New York”
  • describing a petition to vacate an arbitration award, brought under 9 U.S.C. §§ 10 and 203, as an “action”
  • noting that “the plaintiff ‘need not actually prove that defendant committed a tort but rather need only state a colorable cause of action’” (quoting Bank Brussels Lambert v. Fiddler Gonzalez & Rodriguez, 305 F.3d 120, 125 (2d Cir. 2002))
  • discussing the \nexus between the parties' New York contacts and the . . . event giving rise to the plaintiff's injury\
  • rejecting argument, in Convention proceeding seeking to vacate arbitration award, that only contacts related to the arbitration were relevant to personal jurisdiction
  • “arising from” means more than “merely coincidental” or “tangential” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walker, Calabresi, Cabranes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.