Skip to main content
· 4/25/1984

Solberg v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services

Citations

  • 583 F. Supp. 1095
  • 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17298
  • 5 Soc. Serv. Rev. 513

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the conclusive presumption that mailed notice of termination of disability benefits was received violates due process clause, but rebuttable presumption that shifts burden of presenting credible evidence of non-receipt to challenging party is constitutional
  • self-serving allegations of plaintiff and her father were not sufficient to overcome presumption that properly mailed letter had been duly delivered to plaintiff
  • presumption of delivery of mailed letter \may not * * * be given conclusive effect without violating the due process clause \

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Myron L. Gordon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.