Solarworld Americas, Inc. v. United States, Yingli Green Energy Holding Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Razzouk’s bribery was a property offense involving fraud or deceit
• holding that Razzouk’s bribery was a property offense involving fraud or deceit
• “[W]e look to the manner in which [defendant] committed the crime and the facts and circumstances of the crime.”
• “[W]e look to the manner in which [defendant] committed the crime and the facts and circumstances of the crime.”
• “[W]e look to the manner in which [defendant] committed the crime and the facts and circumstances of the crime.”
• “[C]ourts may consider the facts and circumstances of the crime that was committed to determine if it is an ‘offense against property’ within the meaning of the MVRA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).