Skip to main content
· 11/10/1986

Solaroll Shade and Shutter Corp., Inc. v. Bio-Energy Systems, Inc., Broward Solar Center, Inc.

Citations

  • 803 F.2d 1130
  • 6 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 266
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 33395

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • limiting Steuart to situations where there is evidence client is diligent despite attorney's gross negligence
  • limiting Steuart to situations where there is evidence client is diligent despite attorney's gross negligence
  • limiting Steuart to situations where there is evidence client is diligent despite attorney’s gross negligence
  • distinguishing line of cases holding that attorney error applied within the scope of subdivision (b)(6) is fundamentally inconsistent with the mutual exclusivity of subsections (b)(1) and (b)(6)
  • distinguishing line of cases holding that attorney error may fall within the scope of subdivision (b)(6) as fundamentally inconsistent with the mutual exclusivity of subsections (b)(1) and (b)(6)
  • stating a default judgment may be entered “against a defendant who never appears or answers a complaint, for in such circumstances the case never has been placed at issue”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fay, Johnson, Hoffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.