Solar Pane Insulating Glass v. HANSEEN

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when interests of employer and carrier are opposed, this Court will not treat employer as carrier’s alter ego
• holding claimant/employer’s knowledge of continued use of corset would not be imputed to carrier for statute of limitations purposes
• applying the 1985 version of the workers' compensation statute of limitations where a claimant was injured in 1985
• “The limitations period does not begin to run, however, until an injured employee is aware that he or she may be entitled to compensation benefits.”
• “The limitations period does not begin to run, however, until an injured employee is aware that he or she may be entitled to compensation benefits.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).