Skip to main content
· 12/3/2010

Solar Applications Engineering, Inc. v. T.A. Operating Corp.

Citations

  • 327 S.W.3d 104
  • 54 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 238
  • 2010 Tex. LEXIS 889
  • 2010 WL 4910135

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that party may be barred from receiving contract balance by failure to complete condition precedent
  • recognizing that party may be barred from receiving contract balance by failure to complete condition precedent
  • noting that the terms “if,” “provided that,” “on condition that,” or similar language is used to make performance conditional
  • noting that, “[w]hen no conditional language is used and another reasonable interpretation of the contract is possible, ‘the terms will be construed as a covenant in order to prevent a forfeiture’”
  • noting that, “[w]hen no conditional language is used and another reasonable interpretation of the contract is possible, ‘the terms will be construed as a covenant in order to prevent a forfeiture’”
  • defining “condition precedent” as an event that must occur before a right can accrue to enforce an obligation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wainwright, Green

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.