Solano v. a Navas Party Production, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that fifteen instances of travel over a thirty-six month period presented a “close call”
• concluding that coverage would be a “closer call” if the plaintiff could prove his factual assertions, and finding that “[h]aving the parties more fully present the disputed facts at trial will help the Court determine whether Plaintiff was engaged in commerce”
• “Having the parties more fully present the disputed facts at trial will help the Court determine whether Plaintiff was engaged in commerce.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).