Sol Winn v. Edna Hibel Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “a manufacturer may legitimately respond to pressure from a dealer in order to avoid losing that dealer’s business”
• holding that threats from a competitor “by itself [is] not sufficient to establish a case for the jury; a manufacturer may legitimately respond to pressure from a [distributor] in order to avoid losing that particular dealer’s business.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).