Sol Salins, Inc. v. Barton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that at a psychological consultative examination, Claimant’s doctor “provided no formal diagnosis, predicated largely on the limited nature of the claimant’s allegations (13F/3).”
• finding that the ALJ adequately addressed limitations in concentration, persistence, and pace where the “RFC findings accurately reflected [a doctor’s] assessment by restricting [the claimant] to simple, routine tasks and limited interactions with others”
• noting the ALJ’s reliance on the state agency psychological consultant when assessing claimant’s RFC
• noting the ALJ’s reliance on the state agency psychological consultant when assessing claimant’s RFC
• noting the ALJ’s reliance on the state agency psychological consultant when assessing claimant’s RFC
• “[A]n ALJ’s decision should not be overturned simply because the relevant analysis is set forth at a different step of the process.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).