· 2/16/1968
Sol O. Schlesinger, Doing Business as Ideal Uniform Cap Company v. The United States
Citations
- 390 F.2d 702
- 182 Ct. Cl. 571
- 1968 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 56
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he Navy acted as if it had no option but to terminate for default ... once the mere fact of non-delivery was found.”
- Navy may legitimately terminate a contract under \termination for convenience\ clause because of Congressional pressure to do so
- Navy may legitimately terminate a contract un der “termination for convenience” clause because of Congressional pressure to do so
- only where contractor not in default is there breach by government, unless failure to perform is beyond the control of contractor and without his fault or negligence
- only where contractor not in default is there breach by government, unless failure to perform is beyond the control of contractor and without his fault or negligence
- plaintiff under investigation by Senate for procurement irregularities, and in technical default
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cowen, Laramore, Durfee, Davis, Collins, Skelton, Nichols
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.