Skip to main content
· 6/5/1996

Sokaogon Gaming Enterprise Corporation and Sokaogon Chippewa Community v. Tushie-Montgomery Associates, Incorporated

Citations

  • 86 F.3d 656
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 13399
  • 1996 WL 295208

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that interlocutory appeal was appropriate because if defendant were to succeed on interlocutory appeal, “the issue of sovereign immunity will be removed from the case”
  • facing a similar argument, Seventh Circuit gleaned that counsel meant only a statement to this effect will do: “The tribe will not assert the defense of sovereign immunity if sued for breach of contract.”
  • considering sovereign immunity under the Federal Torts Claims Act and the Tucker Act
  • clause requiring arbitration of contractual disputes and authorizing entry of judgment upon arbitral award “in any court having jurisdiction thereof” expressly waived Tribe’s immunity
  • valid contract with arbitration clause agreed upon by both contractor and tribe constituted waiver of sovereign immunity for purposes enforcing arbitration
  • “To agree to be sued is to waive any immunity one might have from being sued.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Ghief, Ripple, Manion

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.