Soho Plaza Corp. v. Birnbaum

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Immigration Judges’ decisions must contain the reasons underlying their determinations, “reflect [their] analysis of the applicable statutes, regulations, and legal precedents, and clearly set forth [their] legal conclusions”
• stating that the Immigration Judge is responsible for the substantive completeness of the decision
• stating that the Immigration Judge’s decision must provide the Board with adequate means of performing its “primary appellate function of reviewing the bases stated for the Immigration Judge’s decision in light of the arguments advanced on appeal”
• “[Overlapping concerns of fundamental fairness and the efficient administration of the appellate process require” remand for a separate opinion.
• commenting on the BIA’s “primary appellate function of reviewing the bases stated for the Immigration Judge’s decision” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).