Skip to main content
· 8/29/1996

Software Design & Application, Ltd. v. Price Waterhouse

Citations

  • 49 Cal. App. 4th 464
  • 57 Cal. Rptr. 2d 36
  • 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7054
  • 96 Daily Journal DAR 11449
  • 1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 882

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that, “although there is no ‘integration’ clause in the engagement letters, they are nonetheless complete.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.