Skip to main content
· 8/29/1996

Software Design & Application, Ltd. v. Hoefer & Arnett, Inc.

Citations

  • 49 Cal. App. 4th 472
  • 56 Cal. Rptr. 2d 756
  • 96 Daily Journal DAR 11438
  • 30 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 898
  • 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7018
  • 1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 878

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding “the 12 circumstances surrounding the opening of the accounts were not so suspicious as to 13 trigger a duty to investigate the phony partnership for the benefit of strangers,” which 14 implicitly acknowledges some circumstances could give rise to such a duty
  • “In this 19 case the banks’ basic duty of care derives from the contract with their customer, accountholder 20 Linda McDonald.”
  • bank not liable to non-customer investors where agent opened account in name of principal and diverted principal’s funds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.