· 8/29/1996
Software Design & Application, Ltd. v. Hoefer & Arnett, Inc.
Citations
- 49 Cal. App. 4th 472
- 56 Cal. Rptr. 2d 756
- 96 Daily Journal DAR 11438
- 30 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 898
- 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7018
- 1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 878
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding “the 12 circumstances surrounding the opening of the accounts were not so suspicious as to 13 trigger a duty to investigate the phony partnership for the benefit of strangers,” which 14 implicitly acknowledges some circumstances could give rise to such a duty
- “In this 19 case the banks’ basic duty of care derives from the contract with their customer, accountholder 20 Linda McDonald.”
- bank not liable to non-customer investors where agent opened account in name of principal and diverted principal’s funds
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.