Soering v. Deeds

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that appellant “must show that when the case is evaluated in the context of the entire record, including the omitted evidence, a jury would have entertained a reasonable doubt” as to appellant’s guilt”
• assuming evidence was admissible and holding it was not material for Brady purposes
• “[The] petitioner must show that when the case is evaluated in the context of the entire record, including the omitted evidence, a jury would have entertained a reasonable doubt regarding petitioner’s guilt.”
• quoting, inter alia, Kyles, 514 U.S. at 435

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).